Sunday, February 26, 2023

Sixth Post- Sofia Coppola as Auteur

 

        Link: https://madmovieman.com/3060-marie-antoinette-2006/

One of the defining characteristics in a Sofia Coppola movie is the main character glancing out a window. In her Marie Antoinette film, Coppola has Antoinette peer out windows in several shots. Antoinette can be seen with her head against the window during a carriage ride early in the film, after asking to be excused from an event with her husband. She stares out a window in one of the film’s final scenes while leaving Versailles. Louis XVI, Antoinette’s husband, and Antoinette left Versailles in France just before a mob destroyed the palace. Louis XVI asked Antionette if she was admiring the view when staring out the window, but she remarked she was saying goodbye. The film stressed the importance of Antionette conceiving a child so an heir to the throne would exist. Antionette received substantial criticism from Louis XVI’s clan in belief she was the reason for the unconsummated marriage. She made an effort, a forced effort, to love the king and seduce him. The king could only think about how tiring his swimming and hunting excursions made him. Joseph II, Antionette’s brother, talked to Louis XVI about romance in terms of key-making and the king and Antionette ended up with a daughter (and then a son and another daughter). Even after pleasing French royalty by producing an heir, Antionette is still limited in her freedoms as royalty. She could not have anything foreign from Austria when she became engrained with France and could not feed her own baby due to protocol. Antionette established a party and gambling reputation while holding an affair with Count Fersen of the Swedish Army.

In Marie Antoinette: Fashion, Third Wave Feminism, and Chick Culture by Suzanne Ferris and Mallory Young, the authors discuss the meaning of chick culture. The phenomenon refers to American and British media forms arising in the 1990’s centered around twenty-to thirty year old college-educated women. Chick culture attempts to explore the intersection of third wave feminism, consumerism, and popular culture (Ferris and Young 98). The third-wave revision requires the audience to see events from Antoinette’s perspective, as a fourteen-year old archduchess separated from family and forced to live with strangers in a foreign court (Ferris and Young 99). Coppola utilized letters written between Antoinette and her mother to establish audience identification with the main character. The director claimed Antoinette was a “lost girl, leaving childhood behind,” who would grasp “the final dignity of a woman” (Ferris and Young 100). Antoinette could be portrayed as a “real girl… who tried to find her own way” (Ferris and Young 100). The film’s opening is wordless, with uses of pop music and an observable teen queen. Viewers are invited into Antoinette’s space when she is shown eating cake and looking squarely into the camera. Antoinette proceeds to wake up from her bed in the next scene, with her hair messy and her face “peaceful (Ferris and Young 101). She plays with her dog, Mops, in her bed, and Coppola portrays this scene to be in a time period no different than the current one. Coppola’s message stepped aside from history and related to Antoinette being an “ordinary girl caught up in extraordinary circumstances” (Ferris and Young 101). Pop music was non-diegetic and diegetic, as the characters hear in a scene at the masked ball. All accounts of Antoinette, and third-wave feminism, address the convergence of fashion and identity. Coppola illustrates Antoinette’s changing of outfits at the French border, no longer a part of the Austrian court. Antoinette is rebranded and stripped of any belongings reminiscent of Austrian culture. She arrived in a white gown, a blank canvas. Through costume design, Antoinette was forced to participate in the luxurious gowns of Versailles fashion (Ferris and Young 102). She is supposed to be the person with power, but Coppola pronounces Antoinette was a victim. The Queen was forced to strip naked several times and questioned protocols when the honor to dress her changed several times in the span of a few seconds. She overcame submission with respect to fashion, as she was able to define herself through attire chosen by her. Coppola emphasized the dress as an expression and definition of self, even “stylizing” the costumes instead of vying for the “expected classical look” (Ferris and Young 104). Colorful sets, elegant food displays, and the Versailles palace added to a gratifying appeal. Pop music mixed with the eighteenth century, and the color pink, signature of post-feminism, was presented profusely. Pink hats, ribbons, shoes, and desserts exemplified the meaning of pink to third-wave feminism. Antoinette appears in over 60 gowns, first submitting to French culture and then rebelling to define her own fashion style as Queen of France (Ferris and Young 105). Fashion also linked to sexuality, as the pressure of Antoinette to produce an heir and have a consummate marriage was perverse. Coppola portrayed Antoinette upset about the sexual desire of Louis XVI. She incorporates a scene from chick culture with Antoinette and her friends trying on loads of shoes and jewelry, drinking champagne, and eating a pink-and-white treat. The song throughout the scene, “I Want Candy,” reinforces Antoinette’s child-like innocence (Ferris and Young 106).

Coppola utilized a few different camera angles, including long shots to show the French landscape. While Antoinette is greeting dignitaries arranged in two lines around her, the camera performs a point-of-view shot. A viewer sees the dignitaries’ faces and expressions from Antoinette’s perspective. Some scenes showed Antoinette and had voiceovers from people talking poorly about Antoinette who were not in the scene. Coppola sets aside historical accuracy, as the Queen would not be able to remove herself out of the constant companionship by flatterers, to probe at our sympathy (Ferris and Young 108). Antoinette was an outsider in her own reign.

Coppola included a key component of film third-wave audiences expect: romance. She invested heartily in portraying the intimacy between Antoinette and Count Fersen. The masquerade ball scene, the bedroom play, and countryside escapes all converge in “chick-flick tradition” ((Ferris and Young 109). The director allowed Antoinette to live, stopping short of Antoinette’s death by the guillotine. Antoinette’s costumes appear devoid of color in the final scenes, signifying an end to the pleasurable and indulgent lifestyle. Her main objective is protection of her family, as she maintained multiple times she should stay with her husband. The act depicting Antoinette bowing to the crowd is an act of mercy, and Coppola engaged the audience in thinking the death of her and her husband could have been an unjust act. Antoinette remained alive in the film and could be seen as a third-wave heroine ((Ferris and Young 110). A movie review by L.V. Jeffrey highlighted the importance in Coppola’s preference for style: “Coppola continues to fascinate by giving professional creative voice to all the girly-girls in the world, ever arguing that they’re a major subset of society.” The society is one we “would be foolish to offhandedly dismiss” (Ferris and Young 111).

An article entitled Off With Hollywood’s Head: Sofia Coppola as a Feminine Auteur, by Todd Kennedy, traces Coppola’s style through her different movies. The gaze, discussed with Rear Window, is used by Coppola. In The Virgin Suicides, the viewer is tempted to lust over the Lisbon sisters. In Marie Antoinette, the viewer may lust over pastries or shoes (Kennedy 41). The spectator becomes aware of the gaze by participating as a voyeur into the events happening on screen. In Marie Antoinette, Coppola grants power to Antoinette when she retorts into the camera “What are you looking at?” after Antoinette is seen lounging on a chair in a seductive manner. The audience became aware of the gaze as Coppola challenges woman as the object of a spectacle (Kennedy 48).  Every aspect of Antoinette’s life appears on display, including being surrounded while eating and visitors intruding on her privacy. Crowds are present for her wedding night and birth of a child, and crowds judged her in the opera house. Antoinette became somewhat empowered through consumerism, by buying and/or wearing new clothes. The wearing of new clothes does not only signal femininity but allows for multiple forms of feminine identity. A powdered wig and taffeta allow Antoinette to become French dauphine. Coppola’s protagonists all struggle with feminine agency, leading to consumption and leisure (Kennedy, 41).  The director takes the quest for identity (mostly a masculine concept according to Kennedy) and creates a feminine perspective, questioning the methodology resulting in women always having to consume (Kennedy, 41).

In Lick the Stars, Coppola relied heavily on the perspective of a young female named Kate. Kate, like Antoinette, was lost in foreign surroundings while attempting to determine her identity. The school structure dominated the characters in the short-film, similar to Versialles dominating over Antoinette (camera angles help the perception). The girls in Lick the Stars were without a voice. A “masculine principal’ was stationed over the camera. He exerted power on Kate and her friends with a point-of-view camera angle, as the group broke the rules (Kennedy, 42). The Virgin Suicides dealt with a group of girls being objectified and led to the question of committing suicide. Coppola’s films explored the objectification, idealization, and definition of female characters by the film and by society. Antoinette in Marie Antoinette is limited by the image and identity imposed on her by society. In Lost in Translation, Coppola depicted an unconsummated relationship in Charlotte and Bob. Bob, portrayed as the “wiser” of the two, was more lost than his younger love interest, Charlotte (Kennedy, 47). She wished to highlight a culture of absence in a world defined by a culture of excess. Bob and Charlotte attended strip clubs, karaoke bars, and Buddhist temples, but the cultural glow ended as a farce (Kennedy 47). Culture in the film is absent, as the film is did not have  interest in portraying a true Japanese culture. Marie Antoinette follows the Queen engulfed in a culture she does not feel connected to. She had to be bored by the mundane daily routines and limited freedom she had in her clothing choices, feeding her baby, and inviting her own guests to functions. Coppola expresses culture can lack substance even if perceived to be grand and amusing.

Citations:

Ferriss, Suzanne and Mallory Young. ““Marie Antoinette”: Fashion, Third-Wave Feminism, and Chick Culture.” Literature/Film Quarterly, vol. 38, no. 2, 2010, https://www.jstor.org/stable/43797666?casa_token=jNKkimehREsAAAAA%3AQhSJBW6pOhEakz2Trjrtwsvsuj7lcudAp75hVaDyY3NVsVCFCtz57X0ZWRgBqqrYQm2q4PxNJ6FgMs4NINcNS1m3rhmdeKHe2iarQW6i5j9oKOPdl8Y. Accessed 26 February 2023.

Kennedy, Todd. “Off With Hollywood’s Head: Sofia Coppola as Feminine Auteur.” Film Critics,. vol. 35, no. 1, 2010, https://www.jstor.org/stable/44019394?casa_token=J9uuCTTaCcUAAAAA%3A3lndRpHD5RNNJ6mnS9LoDOW6PJ6ptaSroP7Mg26YQylo5ky60oKeMyJcT1-i-R9Cx7_Edz74Ja9hLgssaM96pBMjpLVZsf4yoItSH0I4-55Zx-hLzxs. Accessed 26 February 2023.

 

Monday, February 20, 2023

Fifth Post- Rear Window Camera Shot and Reflection

               

       Image Link: https://www.studiobinder.com/blog/point-of-view-shot-camera-movement-angles/ 

The above photo of Lisa is stunning and the product of magnificent camerawork. A dark background contrasts with her face, as Hitchcock utlilizes low-key lighting to make her the center of attention. Jeffries is sleeping and Lisa hovers over him and is about to give him a kiss before he wakes up. Jeffries had been talking to Stella about the possibility, or lack therof, of marrying Lisa. Stella advocated for the marriage, claiming when two people fall in love they "should come together." Jeffries maintained Lisa is "too perfect, too talented, too beautiful" for him. He worried in his conversation with Gunnison about a husband coming home to a nagging wife, even whilst Gunnison attempted to convince him wives discuss. Marriage is drastic to Jeffries. He wants a woman who "will go anywhere and do anything."

StudioBinder defines a point-of-view (POV) camera shot as an angle showing the sightline of another character "in the first person" (StudioBinder). The camera serves as the eyes of the character and our view is the same as the character's view. We see the same as Jeffries sees. The camera is positioned between Lisa and Jeffries' faces. Jeffries is looking at Lisa, and we see Lisa's reaction. A first-person POV shot is meant to make the audience experience the emtions the character is experiencing (Nashville Film Institute). John Belton, in his article The Space of Rear Window, explained Lisa appeared "out of the dreams of the still-sleeping Jeffries" (Belton). Hitchcock chose this photo as our first glimpse of Lisa. A viewer sees the sophistication, elegance, and beauty of Lisa mentioned earlier by Jeffries. The stage is set for Lisa's role in the film, as she will be by Jeffries' side as his love interest.

Belton discussed filming aspects of Rear Window in his article. He highlighted the nuances with each character's apartments. Miss Torso's apartment had ample open space because she was a dancer and moved around frequently. Thorwald's apartment was segmented by two seperate windows for the kitchen/living room and the bedroom area. The two windows seperated Lars from his wife, who remained in the bedroom while her husband kept a prescence in the living room. Miss Lonelyhearts, who also had a segmented house, moved from room-to-room (kitchen to table, etc.) to fill in the empty space (Belton). Hitchcock utilized short-wave radios to communicate with his far-away actors. The actors were equipped with flesh-colored receivers. Belton acknowledges the fixed camera perspective (from Jeffries' apartment) may normally limit the amount of subplots or other character actions the viewer can see. Hitchcock eliminated the problem of missing key information by building the subplots (other apartments) into the set design. Since Jeffries' cannot move, he can only interpret the events he sees and hears from one location (Belton).

 Belton Article Link

 


 

Thursday, February 2, 2023

Fourth Post- Chapter 2: Stanley Kubrick and One-Point Perspective


     Link: https://www.pinterest.com/pin/455919162271169689/

Recurring patterns, or motifs, help identify the theme of a film or director’s style. Sound design, including music and dialogue, narrative structure, and mise-en-scene showcase motifs. Mise-en-scene analyzes a production’s visuals such as set design, costumes, and make-up (Sharman). The one-point perspective is a set design and recurring pattern employed by filmmakers to focus our attention on a scene’s subject in relation to a vanishing point and horizontal line (Nguyen). Stanley Kubrick was a filmmaker known for his consistent use of one-point perspective, especially in horror films. In the above picture from Kubrick’s The Shining, we see the vanishing point as a circle serving as the point of intersection for all the horizontal lines. Danny, the kid in the picture, is sitting on the floor. Our eyes move past Danny and all the way to the barrier, the door, at the end of the hallway. No further sightline is provided past the door. The hallway narrows the viewer’s attention to a long strip and the symmetry along the walls enhances our eyes to the back door or Danny sitting on the floor. Danny’s placement on the floor is too near the camera to be the subject of the vanishing point, but the image of Danny and the entirety of the hallway allows the audience to experience the scene with him. I watched The Shining my senior year of high school in an English class, and I felt tense watching the above frame. Kubrick desired the viewer to enter scenes from behind the camera and experience the suspense an action was going to occur (even though a hallway is the frame’s focal point) (Antunes).

A long shot typically makes us feel further away from the character(s), negating the ability to feel connected to the character’s situation. Kubrick’s use of a long shot is different. The character is not placed at the edge of the frame or the very back of the shot. Danny is near the front of the shot, with a sizable amount of open space behind him. One-point perspectives allow the viewer to see the scene from the character’s perspective and guess whether an act will occur to break the frame’s calm sense (Tibbs). Miguel Para, a filmmaking instructor at the New York Film Academy, emphasized: “Kubrick and his one-point perspective shots force you to look at the world differently. When you crouch down, you’re looking at the world from the point of view of somebody of that height – a child perhaps” (Tibbs). Para encapsulates the photo shown, as the camera is located right above Danny’s head as he squats down. The location of the vanishing point will determine a viewer’s perspective. A vanishing point located on the same side as the main actor of object will restrict the depth created (NG Production Films). The actor or object can be on one of frame’s sides and the vanishing point on the same side and positioned in the back. Most filmmakers, including Kubrick, decided on centering the actor/object and the vanishing point (as in the picture), with the point a bit higher in the horizon line (NG Production Films). The photo I used is one example of Kubrick’s penchant for one-point perspective. As shown in the collage in the chapter, he uses the perspective many times in The Shining and his other films.

As Sharman explains, a film’s form and content allow for a cinematic experience larger than the summation of its parts (Sharman). My biggest takeaway from the chapter is the importance of an implicit theme in film- a message the viewer will take away no matter how well of an understanding he or she may have of the plotline. Individual shots alone cannot create a film, multiple shots need to be juxtaposed and edited so a pattern can be established. Patterns provide viewers an opportunity to engage with a film and allow for cinematic language to evolve. Sharman highlights the difference in composition between cinema and art forms such as painting and photography. Painting and photography frame the images and objects inside the border (the camera or the material being drawn upon). The frame in painting and photography is fixed, as the artist cannot move the content after taking the picture or creating the painting. Cinema allows for movement in composition. Movement occurs within the camera frame of characters and objects (Sharman) and of the frame by allowing the viewer to see different aspects of a set and a mutiple viewpoints of a character's inner thoughts and physical characteristics. Many shows I have watched utilize a close-up or medium shot. The object or character in the scene covers most area in the frame. The one-point perspective is a technique I do not see frequently, but the perspective allows the viewer to see a larger portion of the set and experience the character's surroundings.

Thirteenth Post- From One Second to the Next

  Image Link: https://occ-0-3111-116.1.nflxso.net/art/0720c/506d62cba45a75f1d5b79f08038b8c7121a0720c.jpg Four stories are revealed in Werner...